Perry's Pen
A showcase for George Perry's writing
recent posts
- I think there ought to be “Grandma Lanes”.
- From Springsteen’s Nebraska to North Carolina: Music, Murder, and a Chicken Plant Disaster
- X (Twitter) is to communication what McDonald’s is to nutrition”
- Why Are LinkedIn Posts All the Same?
- The Proto-AI of William S. Burroughs: Cut-Ups, Shotguns, and the Algorithm of Chance
about
Tag: AI
-
Q: i saw two very similar posts on LinkedIn today. Both took a long talk talking about how wonderful their daughter is. Then they said that AI caught them cheating, and asked What do you think? at the end. What is going on? AI: What you’re describing is a trend on LinkedIn—and increasingly on other…
-
William S. Burroughs, an iconic figure of counter-culture, pioneered radical artistic methods like the cut-up technique and shotgun paintings, anticipating debates in today’s AI and LLMs. His experiments with randomness and creativity foreshadow modern generative methods, connecting 20th-century literature to contemporary AI discourse on authorship and creativity.
-
The author expresses a strong dislike for em dashes, attributing this aversion possibly to their social class rather than age. They humorously note that such punctuation was absent from their background and share a fun memory of working on the DASH line at a Ford truck plant, emphasizing their unique perspective.
-
The argument claiming that generative AI is theft equates learning with larceny, overlooking that observation and analysis do not constitute duplication. Like students and teachers, AI processes information to create new art, reflecting collective human heritage. Copyright protects expression, not ideas, emphasizing that creation is rooted in shared knowledge and inspiration.
-
The author responds to being labeled a purveyor of “AI SLOP,” arguing that such dismissive terms reflect ignorance. They share humorous AI-generated definitions of those who use it and outline their trust in AI-generated content after initial skepticism. The article emphasizes the influence of AI on society despite opposition.
-
In this evolving creative landscape, the individual is not a passive observer but an orchestrator. One directs a powerful digital system to realize a creative vision, analogous to a film director managing a production or Warhol supervising the creation of iconic pop art. The canvas is digital, the brush is code, and the primary limitation…
-
The content reflects frustration with the overwhelming anti-AI rhetoric on platforms like LinkedIn, which feels repetitive and exhausting. The author encourages constructive discussions instead of negativity, suggesting that individuals should focus on learning and leveraging AI as a beneficial tool, thereby transforming their energy into positive gains.
-
The author reflects on feeling down during Thanksgiving, experiencing jealousy over American traditions while being in Canada. Despite initial sadness, they create a story idea involving a troubled CEO after engaging with AI. The experience turns unexpectedly positive as inspiration flows, leading to creative output and a light-hearted interaction with ChatGPT.
-
Carlo Rotella’s article discusses his efforts to minimize AI’s impact in classrooms, yet his methods raise concerns about student autonomy and privacy. His requirement for students to submit annotated notes creates pressure for conformity, potentially stifling genuine thought, while his insistence on verbal participation favors extroverted learners, excluding diverse cognitive styles.
-
AI-generated information can be misleading, as it aims to be persuasive rather than accurate. To safeguard against misinformation, employ techniques such as lateral reading, fact-checking quotes, verifying sources, and using the SIFT method. Always investigate claims and compare them across reliable sources for greater accuracy before sharing.
Perry's Pen 